At 00:04 14/10/2002 +0200, Raboo Treed wrote:
>sence no one is using an unpatched qmail it shuldn't be hard to do
>cause how will it do in a chroot enviroment?
Perhaps I misunderstand you, but whether Qmail is patched or not has
nothing to do with Vpopmail's use of "ps" to determine a pid of whatever
process it needs to restart. As for performing in a chroot'ed environment,
as long as that environment has /bin/ps it won't be an issue.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Steve Fulton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 10:42 PM
>Subject: Re: [vchkpw] ps
> > At 13:55 13/10/2002 +0200, Raboo Treed wrote:
> > >Isn't it better to make vpopmail leave a pid file instead then?
> > Sure, if Vpopmail actually had a daemonized process, but it doesn't. "ps"
> > is used to find the pid of whatever Qmail process (qmail-send,
> > etc etc) that needs to be restarted in order to reload the
> > configuration. Every time you add/delete a domain, Qmail must be
> > to notice.
> > -- Steve