Jesse Guardiani said:
> On Tuesday 25 February 2003 03:06, Doug Clements wrote:
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Jesse Guardiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "Doug Clements" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "vpopmail"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 6:47 PM
>> Subject: Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail extension modules
>
> <snip>
>
>> > Does GPL mean that you absolutely HAVE to distribute and publish your
>>
>> code? (I don't think it does... I could be wrong though...)
>>
>> If you change vpopmail (or any other GPL-licensed code), yes, you have
>> to make it available to the public.
>
> I just read the GNU license. I don't see anything that says that I HAVE to
> distribute my changes. There are terms and conditions forced upon me if I
> DO distribute, but nothing about absolutely having to give people my code.
> :)
>
> Did I miss something?

Nope. That matches my understanding as well. The GPL means you can't
distribute binary-only versions. The source code has to be available to
anyone who get's the software. You can even sell it, as long as you include
the source when you do.

>
> <snip>
>
>> --Doug




Reply via email to