> > At 01:29 AM 9/19/2003, X-Istence wrote: > > > >> So then we started getting these messages in our logs: > >> > >> @400000003f69830f2c2df1b4 info msg 47: bytes 1153 from > >> <*************> qp 70866 uid 0 > >> @400000003f69830f2ca1d1c4 starting delivery 60: msg 47 to local > >> ******************* > >> @400000003f69830f2cae02dc status: local 1/10 remote 0/20 > >> @400000003f69830f34a902ac delivery 60: success: did_0+0+1/ > >> @400000003f69830f34c072ac status: local 0/10 remote 0/20 > >> @400000003f69830f34c0a18c end msg 47 > >> > >> This was basically allready better than having it fail to call > >> vdelivermail, but this is still wrong, as an entry should look like > >> this: > >> > >> @400000003f69850e2b908cbc info msg 94300: bytes 5286 from > >> <******************> qp 41793 uid 0 > >> @400000003f69850e2bb94684 starting delivery 4877: msg 94300 to local > >> ****************************** > >> @400000003f69850e2bbf0efc status: local 1/10 remote 0/20 > >> @400000003f69850e2c7fcebc delivery 4877: success: > >> address:_/usr/local/vpopmail/domains/********/*********/Maildir//quota:_1048 57600/did_0+0+1/ > >> > >> @400000003f69850e2c91c07c status: local 0/10 remote 0/20 > >> @400000003f69850e2c91d7ec end msg 94300
> The messages are NOT being delivered. That is what i meant to prove by > the differences in the log files, sorry if i didnt make this clear. The logs on my working 5.3.27 server look like your first example, not the second. Can't say I recall ever seeing anyone post logs that look like your second example Are you sure you didn't apply some sort of patch to your other qmail server to achieve that more "detailed" logging? Michael.
