On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 15:46, Doug Clements wrote:
> Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> > On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 14:35, Doug Clements wrote:
> >> Make sure you used his other big patch as well.
> > it's not required for this. Maybe he doesn't want it. Please don't
> > give him the impression that he NEEDS the other patch for this to
> > work. You can however, recommend it, if you want.
> Actually, the patch Shupp has posted does in fact require his larger patch
> for it to apply cleanly. I just installed it today, I know :)
ok so we're both right and we're both wrong.
the patch functionality itself does not require the qmail-toaster patch,
however, since the patch file itself was created against the
qmail-toaster patch, it requires it to be cleanly patched without manual
intervention. So, if you don't want to do any work, then I guess it
requires the toaster patch.
Perhaps he should make a patch against stock qmail so those of us who
don't want to use his 'toaster' patch can use it anyways.
Kitchen @ #qmail on EFNet - Join the party!
Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc.
866.528.3530 toll free
GNUPG key ID: 93BDD6CE