> ok so we're both right and we're both wrong.
> the patch functionality itself does not require the qmail-toaster patch,
> however, since the patch file itself was created against the
> qmail-toaster patch, it requires it to be cleanly patched without manual
> intervention.  So, if you don't want to do any work, then I guess it
> requires the toaster patch.
> Perhaps he should make a patch against stock qmail so those of us who
> don't want to use his 'toaster' patch can use it anyways.
> -Jeremy

Or he should at least say somewhere on his site that the chkuser patch
requires the toaster.  At least then I would have ignored it instead of
trying to get it to work against vanilla qmail :)


Reply via email to