On Friday 21 May 2004 09:11 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> In the OLD days, people were happy with SMTP-Auth. I consider it LESS > >> security as SMTP after POP, because with SMTP-Auth, You sent Your > >> e-mailadress and Your password of Your mailbox over the internet.
> JKister> Are you insinuating that this is not so with POP3 (or "SMTP after POP") > No not at all, were do You get this ? you said it yourself. > Maybe You read it Your way. no, he read it as you wrote it. > You can authenticate with POP3-SSL, and have a SMTP after POP, so were > is Your point, in this case ? you can also smtp auth over ssl > What I insinuating was to use TLS for SMTP, and not SMTP Auth. you said that later, but that wasn't your original statement. -Jeremy -- Jeremy Kitchen ++ Systems Administrator ++ Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ++ www.inter7.com ++ 866.528.3530 ++ 847.492.0470 int'l kitchen @ #qmail #gentoo on EFnet ++ scriptkitchen.com/qmail