on tuesday 07 september 2004 07:11 pm, tom harrison wrote: > >in short, if the domain is handled by vpopmail, you don't want it in > > locals. > > ok, agreed. just curious, why did you suggest it the first time? please > forgive me if i somehow unconsciously misled you in my first posting, > though i thought i disclosed everything needed....
i suggested you put mail.ts5.com (which is not ts5.com) into locals, or to set
it as an alias to ts5.com.
That's what I did. If you recall from my earlier post, the following part of qmail-showctl's output:
***** locals: Messages for mail.ts5.com are delivered locally. *****
That resulted in error messages of the form:
@40000000413decc0152edbf4 starting delivery 24: msg 3794106 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
@40000000413decc015300ca4 status: local 1/10 remote 1/20
@40000000413decc015d08a94 delivery 24: failure: user_does_not_exist,_but_will_deliver_to_/home/vpopmail/domains/ts5.com/postmaster/Maildir//can_not_open_new_email_file_errno=13_file=/home/vpopmail/domains/ts5.com/postmaster/Maildir/tmp/1094577334.16404.mail.ts5.com,S=3103/system_error/
@40000000413decc015d0b1a4 status: local 0/10 remote 1/20
@40000000413decc015d0b974 triple bounce: discarding bounce/3794106
So, I removed the entry in locals, and depended instead on the entry in virtualdomains, and now I get messages of the form:
@40000000413f3cc3253fed44 new msg 3794133
@40000000413f3cc3254000cc info msg 3794133: bytes 9559 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 13638 uid507
@40000000413f3cc326d99074 starting delivery 9721: msg 3794133 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
@40000000413f3cc326d9abcc status: local 1/10 remote 5/20
@40000000413f3cc3275aa36c delivery 9721: success: user_does_not_exist,_but_will_deliver_to_/home/vpopmail/domains/ts5.com/other/Maildir//did_0+0+1/
@40000000413f3cc3275ac694 status: local 0/10 remote 5/20
@40000000413f3cc3275aca7c end msg 3794133
you could optionally create another completely separate virtualdomain for the domain.. i was just mentioning what i would do. putting mail.ts5.com into locals would not affect the functionality of the ts5.com virtualdomain.
Correct. It did not affect the delivery of mail addressed to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
try sending mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] i bet it will give you the same message.
OK, I did that. Mail sent from one user in the TS4.Com domain also hosted on the same server yields a correct delivery to the mailbox for "[EMAIL PROTECTED]":
***** X-Persona: <TS5 Postmaster> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 10291 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2004 16:29:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO tomivxp.TS4.Com) (192.168.1.51) by 0 with SMTP; 8 Sep 2004 16:29:24 -0000 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@mail.ts4.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.1 Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 09:28:05 -0700 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Tom Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: test virtual domain Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed *****
And mail sent from outside the system to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" also results in a correct delivery to the mailbox for "[EMAIL PROTECTED]":
X-Persona: <TS5 Postmaster>
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 11767 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2004 16:38:10 -0000
Received: from webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com (18.104.22.168)
by 0 with SMTP; 8 Sep 2004 16:38:10 -0000
Received: from wfilter.us4.outblaze.com (wfilter.us4.outblaze.com [22.214.171.124])
by webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with QMQP id AA4251801935
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 16:37:04 +0000 (GMT)
X-OB-Received: from unknown (126.96.36.199)
by wfilter.us4.outblaze.com; 8 Sep 2004 16:33:17 -0000
Received: by ws7-2.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id 40F63E5BCA; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 16:33:11 +0000 (GMT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.41 (Entity 5.404)
Received: from [188.8.131.52] by ws7-2.us4.outblaze.com with http for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 08 Sep 2004 11:33:11 -0500
From: "Tom Harrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 11:33:11 -0500
Subject: test from the outside
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
So, delivery of normal mail still works just fine. It is only the internal mail generated as a double-bounce that fails. I stand confused, still. Thanks in advance for helping me see the light on this.
By the way, I still have the open question regarding a recommendation for a construct similar to the realrcptto patch, to operate with vpopmail and bounce all this crud BEFORE it crawls into the sytem.
-- jeremy kitchen ++ systems administrator ++ inter7 internet technologies, inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ++ www.inter7.com ++ 866.528.3530 ++ 815.776.9465 int'l kitchen @ #qmail #gentoo on efnet ++ scriptkitchen.com/qmail