On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 12:22:34 +0100, tonix (Antonio Nati)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ciao Antonio,
first of all compliments for your work in this patch.
> I don't remember exactly, I studied a lot of documents and found same
> tables that lead me to that decision (to have a close correspondence to
> 5.x.x formats).
I think should be better a 550 reply as RFC 2821:
550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable
(e.g., mailbox not found, no access, or command rejected
for policy reasons)
--
Cris, member of G.U.F.I
Italian FreeBSD User Group
http://www.gufi.org/
