-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Bruno Negrao wrote: > Thanks Tony. Now I understood. > > So I conclude that Matt was mistaken when he told that chkuser could do > smtp-authentication. Is that right Matt?
No, you were mistaken when you thought I meant the chkusr patch did SMTP authentication. I said it works *with* SMTP authentication. The mistake I made, earlier, is that I replied with a chkusr patch link instead of SMTP authentication :) My bad! > > Regards, > bnegrao > > ----- Original Message ----- > > *From:* tonix (Antonio Nati) <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > *To:* vchkpw@inter7.com <mailto:vchkpw@inter7.com> > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 14, 2005 12:37 PM > *Subject:* Re: [vchkpw] Using chkuser as 'smtp-authentication' > mechanism. WAS: [empf] Choosing a good SMTP_AUTH patch > > At 15.53 14/09/2005, you wrote: > >> Hi Dave, >> >> I just discovered that the chkuser-2.0.8b-release ships with a >> netqmail-1.05_auth-0.4.2_chkuser-2.0.8.patch. Maybe this is the >> patch Matt is referring to. > > > vpopmail ships with an auth patch in the contrib directory. That > chkuser version was adapted to that patch. > >> And I'm not sure, but I guess that this patch is Dr Erwin's auth >> patch(the one shipped in vpopmail's contrib directory) but with >> adaptations to be compatible to chkuser. > > > The contrary: netqmail-1.05_auth-0.4.2_chkuser-2.0.8.patch has been > adapted to be applied after the auth patch in vpopmail's contrib. > > >> But I could not find any documentation about what exactly >> netqmail-1.05_auth-0.4.2_chkuser-2.0.8.patch is. > > > > > http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/documentation/installation/automatic.html > > > The *release.tar* package contains some .patch files, ready for > installation, trying to simplify the most frequent situations. > You may use one of these patches if you have these sources: > a clean qmail 1.03 or netqmail 1.05 > qmail 1.03 or netqmail 1.05 patched with auth-0.4.2 (distributed > with vpopmail within the contrib dir, author Erwin Hoffmann - > www.fehcom.de) > qmail 1.03 or netqmail 1.05 patched with toaster-0.6-1 (author > Bill Shupp - see www.shupp.org/toaster for more info or newer > releases) > > Tonino > >> If someone out there knows, tell me please. >> >> Thanks in advance, >> Bruno Negrao >> >>> >>> I don't think he meant it would replace a smtp-auth solution >>> ( I saw the message as well). I use the smtp auth patch >>> included in the contrib directory though I cannot comment on >>> how well it works with chkuser as I run a smtp-auth daemon >>> seperate on another port and let my PIX restrict who has >>> access to smtp-auth. >>> >>> DAve >>> >>>> Thank you in advance, >>>> Bruno Negrao. >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Brookings" >>>> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 11:00 AM >>>> Subject: Re: [empf] SOLVED: [empf] Choosing a good SMTP_AUTH >>>> patch >>>> >>>>> Bruno Negrao wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Making a research in vchkpw's mailing list archive I >>>>>> discovered that >>>>>> vpopmail ships a smtp authentication patch in the >>>>>> "contrib" directory. >>>>>> People are using it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Inter7 uses the chkusr patch, and it works just as well >>>>> with SMTP >>>>> authentication, and with eMPF. >>>>> - -- >>>>> /* >>>>> Matt Brookings GnuPG Key B7B54216 >>>>> Software developer Systems technician >>>>> Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. (815)776-9465 >>>>> */ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> > - -- /* Matt Brookings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG Key B7B54216 Software developer Systems technician Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. (815)776-9465 */ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDKEzXhzYRRre1QhYRAop0AJwIRgf7awcjVrqHZcuBwuCQLFRCLgCfdcyr JcC6RmAXSmikvxSHISRKTc0= =f84k -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
