On 2/5/06, Tom Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's probably a problem elsewhere in the maildirquota code, where we
> use an unsigned long instead of a long.
Sounds good to me, I'll be back in there today as...
> When you made the change, did the problem go away?
It seems to have made it occur less frequently, but definately has not
fixed it. A sample maildirsize file that was pointed out to me this
# cat maildirsize
So my patch has just made the issue a lot more visible.
> > --- maildirquota.c.orig Tue Jan 24 11:24:36 2006
> > +++ maildirquota.c Tue Jan 24 11:24:58 2006
> > @@ -283,5 +283,5 @@
> > char *p;
> > unsigned l;
> > - int n;
> > + long n;
> > int first;