Yes, my english so bad, but you can look at patch for understand me =)
Ok, try again.
At first, patch add new command to vpopmaild: "check_user [EMAIL PROTECTED]".
This command return +OK if [EMAIL PROTECTED] - valid user (or alias, or
maillist etc.) and -ERR if no user found in vpopmail backend. This part
of patch based on chkuser patch for qmail by Antonio Nati.
At second, my patch add centralized permission control - access levels
stored in commands table. As result of this, i could modify "help"
command for return custom answers, based on user's rights (for example,
for anonymous user "help" return only "login, check_user, help, quit"
Next steps for me: add "check_size" command to vpopmaild for checks
users/domain quota and create patch for qmail for check "rcpt to" via
vpopmaild. Hope, all this can be interesting for someone's except me.
Is this my English a little bit better? =( Sorry, if not =)
Let me be the first to say WTF? Is it just me or is this English so
makes no sense to you either?
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dmitriy MiksIr
Sent: Saturday, 10 June 2006 4:08 a.m.
Subject: [vchkpw] vpopmaild patch
VpopmailD - is very useful for many function. May be in future mail
will be delivered via this daemon too =))
I write check_user patch for vpopmaild (as source of ideas was used
chkuser of Antonio Nati). Also i rewrite a little access levels
systems, for centralized access control... and help command for show
only available for current access level commands.
This batch seems work, but not tested very careful - any suggestions
will be welcome.
After weekends i will try to add command for check quotas.
In his defense, his English is better than my Russian.
Thinking about that, his English is better than many journalists. I have
read articles more than twice and still not been able to understand what
was intended. ;^)