On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Matt Brookings <m...@inter7.com> wrote:
> Does your patch take into account that dir_control is occasionally inside a > database, or does it only work with the CDB backend? It's okay if it > doesn't > yet, but we definitely need it to in the future. The patch uses the dir_control functions like vwrite_dir_control() and does not directly interface with dir_control. So it would work regardless of the backend !DSPAM:496e0ce232672063011830!