On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Matt Brookings <m...@inter7.com> wrote:

> Does your patch take into account that dir_control is occasionally inside a
> database, or does it only work with the CDB backend?  It's okay if it
> doesn't
> yet, but we definitely need it to in the future.


The patch uses the dir_control functions like vwrite_dir_control() and does
not directly interface with dir_control. So it would work regardless of the
backend


!DSPAM:496e0ce232672063011830!

Reply via email to