Hi Matt,

Haha, that's funny. I forgot to check there.

Well, never mind then :].

Kind regards,
Harm van Tilborg
Tiscom Hosting B.V.

Matt Brookings wrote:
> Harm van Tilborg wrote:
>> A fix: checking whether `num_names != 0' (but that will not shrink the
>> array), or -- it's late so I haven't checked -- just sticking
>> `realloc()'s return address directly into `names'.
>> Hope it all clear, and somebody can do something with it :].
> Thanks.  This artifact is already in the bug tracker though.


Reply via email to