-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jukka Kurkela wrote:
> You mean CDB is way faster, right? if not, can you provide some
> benchmark results or even explanation?
CDB is faster than MySQL. MySQL is perfect for sites that need to cluster.
If your potential growth does not indicate a need to cluster, I'd stick with
CDB, mostly because it's one less point of failure, as well as the fact that
there's no networked database with resource locking involved.
- --
/*
Matt Brookings <m...@inter7.com> GnuPG Key FAE0672C
Software developer Systems technician
Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. (815)776-9465
*/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAktMhw4ACgkQIwet2/rgZywvAwCZAd1TjWvI3T1gJV7r7IYG5NjK
AYcAniedEvwpbAedPvg1TcDtdD1ZgCvs
=2WqA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
