We are still using VMware Server so I would vote "yes". (We also use Xen, VirtualBox, and KVM prioritized in that order.)
Mark On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Josh Thompson <josh_thomp...@ncsu.edu>wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > When we released VCL 2.1, we had the following road map for 2.2 and 2.3: > > VCL 2.2 > > * support for xCAT 2.3 > * improve cluster reservations > * improve block reservations(rename to block allocations) > > VCL 2.3 > > * Service deployments > * power management > * VMWare Free Server 2.x > > I'd like to propose swapping "improve cluster reservations" and "VMWare > Free > Server 2.x". We don't hear much about people using cluster reservations, > and > they work fairly well if you only have one management node. Windows 7 > works > much better under VMWare Free Server 2.x; so, it would probably provide > more > value to everyone to get that support added in sooner than reworking the > cluster reservation code. That would give us this road map: > > VCL 2.2 > > * support for xCAT 2.3 > * VMWare Free Server 2.x > * improve block reservations(rename to block allocations) > > VCL 2.3 > > * Service deployments > * power management > * improve cluster reservations > > Any thoughts? > > Thanks, > Josh > - -- > - ------------------------------- > Josh Thompson > Systems Programmer > Advanced Computing | VCL Developer > North Carolina State University > > josh_thomp...@ncsu.edu > 919-515-5323 > > my GPG/PGP key can be found at pgp.mit.edu > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFLcZWMV/LQcNdtPQMRAlt6AJ9KXTnKRvvAQbu/vXbOlZMR1TC0ugCfXuv0 > xZbkJWpfzWJMgdlzAClghMw= > =mY43 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -- Mark Gardner --
