Sounds good.

On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Waldron, Michael H
<mwald...@email.unc.edu>wrote:

> Makes sense to me.
>
>
> Mike Waldron
> Systems Specialist
> ITS Research Computing
> University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
> CB 3420, ITS Manning, Rm 2509
> 919-962-9778
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josh Thompson [mailto:josh_thomp...@ncsu.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 9:52 AM
> To: vcl-dev@incubator.apache.org; vcl-u...@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: use of these lists
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> When we started at ASF, the vcl-user list wasn't really used much.  So,
> most
> user questions were sent to the vcl-dev list.  The community has grown
> quite a
> bit since then, and the vcl-user list is starting to see more use.  I think
> it
> would be a good idea to somewhat "officially" distinguish the two lists
> moving
> forward.
>
> Any discussion about things related to the development of VCL should go to
> the
> vcl-dev list.  Any discussion about installation, configuration, and use of
> VCL should go to the vcl-user list.  If you're not sure which list
> something
> should go to, just pick one.  No one's going to be mean to you about
> sending
> it to the wrong list, though if it would be more appropriate to the other
> list, someone may choose to include the other list in replies.
>
> Does this sound like a good idea?
>
> Thanks,
> Josh
> - --
> - -------------------------------
> Josh Thompson
> VCL Developer
> North Carolina State University
>
> my GPG/PGP key can be found at pgp.mit.edu
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk1SqgwACgkQV/LQcNdtPQNQiQCdGBdZf2dThXIiPyxJZLG9fjmq
> D4wAn0+vV2fWMgULyWf3h+0Cf4sq4UpM
> =N8RF
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

Reply via email to