Richard Hartmann wrote: > Hi all (i.e. Joey), > > git annex fsck > > is a no-op in a bare repository. While I can understand that there is > no (easy) way to verify the symlinks, the annex objects are there > regardless. > Wouldn't it make sense to allow me to check repo integrity in bare > repos, as well?
Yes, fsck could check the size and checksum (if available). It could not check the location log correctness or number of available copies. > As an aside, should those "smaller" issues go into the wiki or onto > this list? Both is fine by me. Personally, I would lean towards "Keep > small stuff on the list, save in wiki if there is a need". I prefer to track such stuff on the wiki. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ vcs-home mailing list vcs-home@lists.madduck.net http://lists.madduck.net/listinfo/vcs-home
