Richard Hartmann wrote: > The problem is that, afaik, I can't have it as a bare special remote.
It would be very weird to have a bup repository that is *not* bare. > The use case is that I built & hosted a server for backups and backups > only. As origin, it's used to sync git state between all other repos > and always keeps a copy of all files, forever. Obviously, I'd like to > keep the bup repo in there, as well. As I said, it's probably possible to use a branch of the same repository for bup as for git-annex, but I'm not sure why it would be worth the setup bother, compared with having a separate repository for bup. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ vcs-home mailing list vcs-home@lists.madduck.net http://lists.madduck.net/listinfo/vcs-home