Git handles symlinks perfectly. :-) On 25/09/2013 2:38 PM, "Dylan Kinnett" <dylan.kinn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That does sound delightfully simple. I just didn't know: how does Git > handle symbolic links? Thanks for that suggestion. :) > > On Sep 25, 2013, at 12:35 AM, Olaf TNSB <still.another.per...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Couldn't you keep it really simple, create a sub-directory, "anthology", > and use symbolic links to the files? > > > Olaf > On 25/09/2013 1:49 PM, "Dylan Kinnett" <dy...@nocategories.net> wrote: > >> Would it be better, then, to create a fork, instead of a branch? (I don't >> understand forks just yet.) In my situation here, I wouldn't want to treat >> the non-edited files as deleted although I would want to move the changes >> back to the master version, but also I also wouldn't want the sub-set to >> contain all of the files. >> _______________________________________________ >> vcs-home mailing list >> vcs-home@lists.madduck.net >> http://lists.madduck.net/listinfo/vcs-home >> > _______________________________________________ vcs-home mailing list vcs-home@lists.madduck.net http://lists.madduck.net/listinfo/vcs-home