On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:04:13AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Stefano Zacchiroli <z...@debian.org> [2009.05.10.1616 +0200]: > > I _think_ that Manoj's point was more about the fact that > > re-creating the auto* files are not (necessarily) part of the > > trust relationship that users put into the pristine-ness of > > upstream tarball. > I am not sure I parse you correctly. Are you saying distro packagers > should or should not recreate auto* files?
Sorry for the unclear wording. I'm saying that the trust our users have in the "pristine-ity" of upstream sources should not rely on the fact that we do not change auto* files. Hence if, for any reason, we find appropriate to recreate auto* files, we should do that. In particular, if it helps in syncing with upstream VCSs and get rid of tarballs, let's recreate auto* more often! Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 z...@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ vcs-pkg-discuss mailing list vcs-pkg-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/vcs-pkg-discuss