On 02/03/08 13:39, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
>> On 02/03/08 13:26, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
>>> Hi Klaus,
>>> On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
>>>> Should there be a stable version 1.6.0 now, based on what's in
>>>> version 1.5.14, but without DVB-S2 or even H.264 support?
>>> With H264 support, because some DVB-T channels (at least here in France)
>>> are starting to carry H264-channels, afaiu unencrypted.
>>> With Multiproto support (DVB-S2), but only if VDR is able to switch to the
>>> current DVB-API provided by standard kernels at compile time. I guess
>>> Multiproto will not be there before 2.6.26 or even later. There is a bunch
>>> of drivers currently not working with Multiproto.
>> There can only be "Yes" or "No" answers ;-)
> There can be only yes or no to a "yes-or-no question". The latter criteria
> does not apply for yours.
> Maybe shorter: yes, without DVB-S2 support, with H264.
Well, basically the question was "Should there be a stable version 1.6.0 now,
based on what's in version 1.5.14, but without DVB-S2". Maybe I shouldn't have
added the "or even H.264 support" part.
That said, I count your vote as a "No".
vdr mailing list