Yes Frank you are right. The problem is coming from bad CRC in the PMT (and the same apply to bad PAT). If Pmt.CheckCRCAndParse() fails, bad PMT data should be skipped. @Klaus: will you look at this enhancement before rolling out 1.7.4? _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
- [vdr] PMT in multiple TS packet bug Alexw
- Re: [vdr] PMT in multiple TS packet bug Frank Schmirler
- Re: [vdr] PMT in multiple TS packet bug Alexw
- Re: [vdr] PMT in multiple TS packet bug Frank Schmirler
- Re: [vdr] PMT in multiple TS packet b... Alexw
- Re: [vdr] PMT in multiple TS pac... Frank Schmirler
- Re: [vdr] PMT in multiple TS... Alexw
- Re: [vdr] PMT in multipl... Mika Laitio
- Re: [vdr] PMT in multipl... Alexw
- Re: [vdr] PMT in multipl... Frank Schmirler
- Re: [vdr] PMT in multipl... Klaus Schmidinger
- Re: [vdr] PMT in multipl... Matthias Schwarzott
- Re: [vdr] PMT in multipl... alexw
- Re: [vdr] PMT in multipl... Oliver Endriss
- Re: [vdr] PMT in multipl... Klaus Schmidinger