On 26.01.2009 23:01, Deti Fliegl wrote:
> Udo Richter wrote:
>> Definitely something that is worth considering. The patch also brings us
>> one step closer towards hotplug support, a feature that seems very
>> obvious in times of USB DVB devices.
> Yep you are right but IMHO there would be some more work to do:
> VDR should compile also without direct Linux DVB kernel support. So we
> could get rid of any specific Linux dependency (and use VDR for BSD
> based systems like MacOS without patching). Therefore section filtering
> should make use of a virtual Read() method in the device class. There
> also needs to be an abstraction for signal information so that plugins
> like channelscan and femon are not depending on the direct DVB access.
> Maybe it makes sense to have a Linux DVB device plugin.
Putting cDvbDevice into a plugin is on my agenda, but TS recording and
full HDTV support comes first. Don't even send a patch for this - I won't
look into it at this time.
vdr mailing list