You are absolutely right, the P4 has indeed 2.4GHz (and 512MB of RAM)
Which makes it the more surprising that on SD channels I am getting cpu
utilization in the region of 80% to 95%
It should be a lot less?

This is the lspci output for the graphics card:
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 82845G/GL[Brookdale-G]/GE/PE DRAM
Controller/Host-Hub Interface (rev 01)
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation
82845G/GL[Brookdale-G]/GE Chipset Integrated Graphics Device (rev 01)
00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBL/DBM
(ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) AC'97 Audio Controller (rev 01)

Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 23:34:15 +0100
From: Tony Houghton <>
Subject: Re: [vdr] speeding up vdr+xine on an old Pentium4
Message-ID: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 22:41:32 +0200
<> wrote:

I?ve taken an old PC (Intel graphics card on board, p...@553mhz, 512Megs of
RAM) and installed mms, vdr and lirc basically.

Do you mean P3 or have you mistyped the clock speed? The slowest P4 was
about 1400MHz, I thought. Surely one wouldn't be underclocked by such a
huge factor.

TH *

vdr mailing list

Reply via email to