On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 19:09:46 +0100
Andreas Brachold <m...@deltab.de> wrote:

> Hi,
> Am Mittwoch, den 10.11.2010, 12:23 +0100 schrieb Frank Schmirler:
> > ACK. Unique IDs over the lifetime of an SVDRP connection solve the
> > actual problem. Everything beyond get's too complicated.
> Here I would agree with you. 
> > Guess a touch /video/.update would result in new IDs for all
> > recordings. So one must be aware that if an ID is no longer
> > available, the corresponding item has not necessarily been deleted.
> Why ? This is not even necessary ! 
> Missing recordings should simple remove from list (LSTR) and new
> recordings should added at end of list.
> Anything else would not work with existing svdrp programs.
> But right now VDR can use only one connection at same time. 
> From my point of view (xxv as svdrp client), I would not block the
> connection permanent. And I do not would to reread every time any
> recordings.

So the problem is not the recording numbering (for what ?) , but the
svdrp limitation to one connection. 

vdr mailing list

Reply via email to