Am Samstag, 13. November 2010 schrieb Steffen Barszus:
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 23:10:23 +0100
> Dieter Hametner <dh+...@gekrumbel.de> wrote:
> > The live-plugin has support (contributed by third party developer)
> > for SSL connections to its internal web-server. See the README file
> > in LIVE for more details.
> > 
> > The concept how LIVE works as plugin could be generalized to provide
> > a 'generic' (SVDRP like) access via xml-http(s)-requests or via JSON
> > etc.
> I like this idea a lot - additional advantage is that the access that
> way should be easier for the accessing applications.
> > The general disadvantage of such an approach is, that it creates an
> > 'officially unsupported' way to control VDR remotely. I mean it does
> > not get 'standardized' by Klaus :)
> As long as more than one project is using this, it should be fine.

Well the LIVE plugin could make use of this new infrastructure :) That could 
be number one  but it is not a promise :)


Dieter Hametner                    dh (plus) vdr (at) gekrumbel (dot) de
live plugin developer              http://live.vdr-developer.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

vdr mailing list

Reply via email to