On 03/07/11 13:23, Frank Schmirler wrote:
> Hi,
> On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 17:15:44 +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote
>> The problem is that the VPS code in vdr.c avoids devices that are
>> currently recording. And since this is a rather complex area,
>> I'm not sure if it's too good an idea to change this ;-)
>> If you feel like it, you may want to take a look at the code under
>>   // Find a device that provides the required transponder:
>> in vdr.c. Maybe you can come up with a better solution...
> Unless I've missed something, that code does not only ignore priorities but
> also the availability of CAMs.

We only need the EIT data here, which is not encrypted.
So it's sufficient to find a device that provides the
raw transponder.


vdr mailing list

Reply via email to