On 07.03.2011 19:56, Markus Ehrnsperger wrote:
> 2011/3/7 Steffen Barszus <steffenbpu...@googlemail.com>:
>> 2011/3/7 Klaus Schmidinger <klaus.schmidin...@tvdr.de>:
>>> On 03/07/11 14:13, Frank Schmirler wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 13:33:47 +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote
>>>>> On 03/07/11 13:23, Frank Schmirler wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 17:15:44 +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote
>>>>>>> The problem is that the VPS code in vdr.c avoids devices that are
>>>>>>> currently recording. And since this is a rather complex area,
>>>>>>> I'm not sure if it's too good an idea to change this ;-)
>>>>>>> If you feel like it, you may want to take a look at the code under
>>>>>>>   // Find a device that provides the required transponder:
>>>>>>> in vdr.c. Maybe you can come up with a better solution...
> Hi,
> I have a suggestion: Treat the VPS margin the same way as the time a
> non VPS timer will start before the EPG event starts. Example:
> Tagesschau, starts at 8:00 PM.
> If I don't use VPS, I will create a timer at 7:58 PM (in case the news
> start slightly before 8)
> If I use VPS, I will create a timer at 8:00 PM. The VPS margin is 2
> minutes (in this example).
> If I don't use VPS, another recording (with lower priority) will be
> stopped at 7.58 PM. The timer will start recording.
> If I use VPS, another recording (with lower priority) will be stopped
> at 7.58 PM (my suggestion). The next two minutes, the device will be
> used for VPS checking only. The recording will start at 8:00 PM.
> Of course, this might look like wasting a device for two minutes only
> to check the VPS. On the other side, not using VPS is even worse: I
> will waste the device and disk space. So, using VPS is still better.
> And, the timer with lower priority has lower priority by purpose. So,
> I want it to be interrupted.
> Summary:
> I suggest to use GetDevice as soon as the timer is within the VPS margin.
> This has the following advantages:
> - Easy to implement
> - Easy to understand for users, and expected behavior: The timer with
> higher priority has higher priority :) .
> - No rocket science
> I admit, it has some disadvantages. But, from my point of view, these
> are minor compared to the advantages. At the moment, I can use VPS
> only with care as I might miss a recording with very high priority.
> Markus

Please provide a (tested) patch that implements this.


vdr mailing list

Reply via email to