On 27.12.2012 23:40, fnu wrote:
... But the way of the last changes, in best manner of Louis XIV, ignoring all other needs around can't be the right way.
All I did was to accept a patch from Christopher Reimer that removed some redundancy in the Makefiles and would better isolate the plugins Makefiles from the core VDR. Sure, it's an incompatible change, but sometimes you have to make some deeper cuts, and a developer version is the place to do that. I even provided a sample patch that shows all the necessary changes to plugin Makefiles, and I am now working on integrating the input that was triggered by this change (see the patch I posted earlier today). If I don't accept patches, I'm blamed for slowing down development. If I do accept a patch that causes a little work to adapt to (but looks promising in the long run), I'm being offended by being compared to Louis XIV. I guess you just can't win 'em all... Klaus _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
