> Need to solicit responses on the list.
> Dan, Saggi, Edu, Federico, please reply with your thoughts on this.
> We already know that in the next 2 versions the code is going to change *a 
> lot*.  So it's not clear what the value of doing this at the present moment 
> is (adds pains for something that will change 10 times in the next year or 
> so).

If you are going with codes, it makes sense to add msg ids from the beginning, 
not as a retrofit. Yes, some message numbers may not be used when code changes 
discards a message, the overall process should be more consistent.


Subhendu Ghosh
Red Hat
Email: sgh...@redhat.com

vdsm-devel mailing list

Reply via email to