On Sun 11 Dec 2011 10:15:23 AM EST, Andrew Cathrow wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Saggi Mizrahi"<smizr...@redhat.com>
>> To: "VDSM Project Development"<email@example.com>,
>> Sent: Friday, December 9, 2011 5:41:42 PM
>> Subject: [Engine-devel] shared fs support
>> Hi, I have preliminary (WIP) patches for shared FS up on gerrit.
>> There is a lot of work to be done reorganizing the patches but I
>> just wanted all the TLV guys to have a chance to look at it on
>> I did some testing and should work as expected for most cases.
>> To test just connectStorageServer with storageType=6 (sharedfs)
>> connection params are
>> 'mnt_options'='opt,opt=3,opt' }
>> to check with an existing NFS domain you can just
> So does that mean that we treat nfs custom types differently -eg using the
> out or process stuff?
>> I only tested NFS but I am going to test more exotic stuff on Monday.
>> This is the patch to build the RPM from.
>> Have a good weekend
>> Engine-devel mailing list
Using the custom NFS will give you the tested supported options and
limits. Using sharedfs will give you a generic implementation.
Currently the underlying implementation is the same. But there is a
plan to use a simpler implementation (without using OOP as it's an NFS
specific hack) and also loose stale handle checks and other NFS
vdsm-devel mailing list