----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ayal Baron" <aba...@redhat.com> > To: "Andrew Cathrow" <acath...@redhat.com> > Cc: vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org, "wangxiaofan" <wangxiao...@opzoon.com> > Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 8:40:49 AM > Subject: Re: about shared disk file system > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "wangxiaofan" <wangxiao...@opzoon.com> > > > To: vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org > > > Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 8:21:43 AM > > > Subject: about shared disk file system > > > > > > Hi there, > > > To support SAN storage in vdsm, is there any plan to use > > > shared > > > disk file system, such as Red Hat GFS or OCFS2, > > > instead of lvm? > > > > One of the features we're adding to oVirt is the ability to have > > plug-able file domains. Today we support block based (iscsi/fiber) > > and NFS. We'll add support for generic filesystems [1]. > > > > For some filesystems this will be pretty straight forward eg > > Gluster, > > GPFS but GFS adds some extra complications - it brings along it's > > own cluster stack that provides membership management, fencing etc. > > so do gpfs and gluster. > as long as you don't mix LVM based domains with GFS you should be > fine.
GFS/Clustersuite will power off nodes, GPFS and Gluster won't. > > > > > > > [1] > > https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/vdsm-devel/2011-December/000408.html > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > vdsm-devel mailing list > > > vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org > > > https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > vdsm-devel mailing list > > vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org > > https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel > > > _______________________________________________ vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
