----- Original Message -----
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 10:32:49AM -0500, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
> > flowID makes no sense after the initial API call as stuff like
> > cacheing\threadpools\samplingtasks\resources\asyncTasks so flowing
> > a flow like that will not give you the entire picture while
> > debugging.
> > Also adding it now will make everything even more ugly.
> > You know what, just imagine I wrote one of my long rambles about
> > why I don't agree with doing this.
> I cannot imagine you write anything like that. Really. I do not
> understand why you object logging flowID on API entry point.
The question is, what problem is this really trying to solve and is there a
simpler and less obtrusive solution to that problem?
> vdsm-devel mailing list
vdsm-devel mailing list