----- Original Message ----- > On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 10:32:49AM -0500, Saggi Mizrahi wrote: > > flowID makes no sense after the initial API call as stuff like > > cacheing\threadpools\samplingtasks\resources\asyncTasks so flowing > > a flow like that will not give you the entire picture while > > debugging. > > > > Also adding it now will make everything even more ugly. > > You know what, just imagine I wrote one of my long rambles about > > why I don't agree with doing this. > > I cannot imagine you write anything like that. Really. I do not > understand why you object logging flowID on API entry point.
The question is, what problem is this really trying to solve and is there a simpler and less obtrusive solution to that problem? > > _______________________________________________ > vdsm-devel mailing list > vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org > https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel > _______________________________________________ vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel