On 22/02/12 18:25, Mike Burns wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 18:10 +0200, Doron Fediuck wrote:
>> On 22/02/12 17:58, Mike Burns wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 17:33 +0200, Doron Fediuck wrote:
>>>> On 22/02/12 16:57, Mike Burns wrote:
> 
> <snip>
> 
>>>
>>> vdsm-reg runs on *every* boot anyway and renames the bridge.  This is
>>> something that was debated previously, but it was decided to re-run it
>>> every boot.
>>>
>> Close, but not exactly; vdsm-reg will run on every boot, but
>> if the relevant bridge is found, then networking is unchanged.
> 
> Yes, that's true, but vdsm-reg doesn't persist the changes it makes.  So
> on the next boot, it will never find the management bridge it's looking
> for.  So while the condition is there to skip it, it will actually never
> find the bridge and will run the rename every boot.  
> 
Sounds like a bug to me.
Last time I handled it, network configuration was persisted.
You can see in line 102 here: 
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/gitweb?p=vdsm.git;a=blob;f=vdsm_reg/vdsm-reg-setup.in;h=c51f40c53f5303cfb447cedf5bc0c16228cb876d;hb=HEAD

-- 

/d

"Who's General Failure and why's he reading my disk?"
_______________________________________________
vdsm-devel mailing list
vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel

Reply via email to