----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dan Kenigsberg" <dan...@redhat.com>
> To: "Federico Simoncelli" <fsimo...@redhat.com>
> Cc: "VDSM Project Development" <vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2012 10:30:05 AM
> Subject: Re: Running VDSM (master branch) on Fedora 16
> 
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 04:20:18AM -0400, Federico Simoncelli wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Federico Simoncelli" <fsimo...@redhat.com>
> > > To: "Dan Kenigsberg" <dan...@redhat.com>
> > > Cc: "VDSM Project Development"
> > > <vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2012 10:16:15 AM
> > > Subject: Re: Running VDSM (master branch) on Fedora 16
> > > 
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Dan Kenigsberg" <dan...@redhat.com>
> > > > To: "Federico Simoncelli" <fsimo...@redhat.com>
> > > > Cc: "VDSM Project Development"
> > > > <vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2012 10:06:00 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: Running VDSM (master branch) on Fedora 16
> > > > 
> > > > On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 03:43:13AM -0400, Federico Simoncelli
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > From: "Dan Kenigsberg" <dan...@redhat.com>
> > > > > > To: "Federico Simoncelli" <fsimo...@redhat.com>
> > > > > > Cc: "VDSM Project Development"
> > > > > > <vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org>
> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2012 9:36:26 AM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: Running VDSM (master branch) on Fedora 16
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 01:02:31PM -0400, Federico
> > > > > > Simoncelli
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >  lately we introduced two new requirements in the VDSM
> > > > > > >  master
> > > > > > >  branch,
> > > > > > > therefore if you want to run the latest code on Fedora 16
> > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > need
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > update some packages that aren't shipped officially
> > > > > > > (yet):
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > lvm2-2.02.95-6.fc16
> > > > > > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3959741
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > libvirt-0.9.10-2.fc16
> > > > > > > http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/jforbes/virt-preview/
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > More info on the Virtualization Preview Repository:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Virtualization_Preview_Repository
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Federico, since scratch build tend to die young, could you
> > > > > > create
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > yum
> > > > > > repo with the lvm2 build in your fedorapeople place?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Actually I was waiting to follow up with an official build
> > > > > from
> > > > > the
> > > > > lvm team.
> > > > 
> > > > I don't think this is expected. This is only a hack to let
> > > > folks
> > > > test
> > > > upstream vdsm on Fedora 16. Newer lvm2 build is formally
> > > > expected
> > > > only
> > > > on in Fedora 17
> > > 
> > > I'm not saying that they'll release it for Fedora 16. They could
> > > just
> > > do
> > > a regular build (so that it won't expire in a short time).
> > > 
> > > Anyway both packages (lvm2, libvirt) can be installed on Fedora
> > > 16
> > > using
> > > the command:
> > > 
> > > # yum --releasever=17 update lvm2 libvirt
> 
> That would be great.
> 
> > > 
> > > They don't need any particular dependency/repository:
> > > 
> > > Updating:
> > >  libvirt                     x86_64  0.9.10-2.fc17
> > >  lvm2                        x86_64  2.02.90-1.fc17
> > 
> > Sorry I just realized that 2.02.95 is not released yet.
> 
> Neither have I noticed this. I really hope we can push 2.02.95 into
> f17.
> Could you ask lvm2 guys to it? Otherwise we'd be stuck with this
> incompatiblity deep into f18.

Looks like it will be released soon (for fc17):

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-4877

-- 
Federico
_______________________________________________
vdsm-devel mailing list
vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel

Reply via email to