On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 03:23:10PM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 04:42:47PM -0400, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
> > 
> > You are correct though that setting the logging level back or changing the 
> > amount of logs kept shouldn't be such a bothersome process and you should 
> > open a bug on that for VDSM and it will be fixed.
> > 
> 
> Since Bugzilla reports do not convert themselves to code, I would like
> to give some background. Historically, Vdsm is "the thing that makes a
> host part of RHEV", and it is thus responsible for non-conventional
> stuff such as configuring libvirt logs and starting/stopping other
> services.
> 
> Now that we develop upstream, our charter has changed a bit. Community
> members may wish to run vdsm but not have the RHEV configuration for
> other services.
> 
> We need to move host-config operation out of Vdsm and its vdsmd service,
> and put it into our yet-empty vdsm-tool. This way we keep our downstream
> supportability with upstream flexibility.

+1 to this!  I actually was not aware of vdsm-tool.  Is there a wiki page or
some other existing discussion about ideas around this?

-- 
Adam Litke <a...@us.ibm.com>
IBM Linux Technology Center

_______________________________________________
vdsm-devel mailing list
vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel

Reply via email to