On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 01:00:27AM +0300, Itamar Heim wrote:
> On 04/06/2012 06:00 PM, Ryan Harper wrote:
> >Re-sending this to arch as in our meeting this week we agreed no reason
> >to not implement DCO (http://kerneltrap.org/files/Jeremy/DCO.txt) but
> >that we needed to enlist the maintainers to work out enforcement.
> that's easy enough since we use gerrit.
> if acked by all, i can simply enable 'force sign-off' on patches
> option in gerrit and it will be enforced...
> >1. http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/arch/2012-April/000433.html
I do not mind requring the make-my-lawyer-happy line in all Vdsm commits,
and I suppose that this would be fine by everybody on vdsm-devel. Tell
us when this takes effect, we'll prepare our commit-msg hooks by then.
Anything cooler we can do beyond putting
SOB=$(git var GIT_AUTHOR_IDENT | sed -n 's/^\(.*>\).*$/Signed-off-by: \1/p')
grep -qs "^$SOB" "$1" || echo "$SOB" >> "$1"
at the bottom of .git/hooks/commit-msg ?
> >----- Forwarded message from Ryan Harper<ry...@us.ibm.com> -----
> >From: Ryan Harper<ry...@us.ibm.com>
> >Subject: code sign-off/DCO for ovirt projects
> >Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 14:59:40 -0500
> >User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
> >To: bo...@ovirt.org
> >I see that this was discussed in the past on the board list and there
> >didn't seem to be any disagreement with doing DCO sign-off for code
> >contributions. However, not all of the ovirt projects are doing
> >DCO/Sign-off. There are a few commits in vdms.git that have a SoB,
> >ovirt-node seems to be using DCO completely. Nothing in ovirt-engine
> >either. I didn't check all of the ovirt subprojects, but I think
> >it's safe to assume that's not being applied across all of the
> >projects consistently.
> >Can we get that added to the commit process for these projects moving
> >forward? Is there anything else needed beyond maintainers enforcing the
> >need for SoB in patches?
> >1. http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/board/2011-October/000168.html
> Arch mailing list
vdsm-devel mailing list