----- Original Message -----
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> Hello all,
> I'm currently working on a patch to correct the logic used by vdsm
> reviewing the logical and physical block size of physical volumes
> Once/If this is approved I'd like to look into making the exceptions
> thrown from vdsm and the errors displayed within engine more
> Before I start throwing patches into gerrit I was wondering *if*
> is a preferred workflow when adding additional exceptions and error
> messages across both projects. For example, committing changes to
> before engine, engine before vdsm or both at the same time.
> I'm also wondering if there is a way to say that vdsm gerrit changeid
> relies on engine gerrit changeid y etc?
Adding in engine does not rely on vdsm actually throwing the exception.
Adding in vdsm without corresponding code in engine would just mean that a
generic message is displayed to user, so either way is ok as long as you make
sure to submit both.
There is no need for a dependency between gerrits (and I'm not sure how that
would work either, but I'm not aware of any such mechanism at the moment).
> Thanks in advance,
> - --
> Lee Yarwood
> Software Maintenance Engineer
> Red Hat UK Ltd
> 200 Fowler Avenue IQ Farnborough, Farnborough, Hants GU14 7JP
> Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No.
> Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Brendan Lane (Ireland), Matt
> Parson(USA), Charlie Peters (USA)
> GPG fingerprint : A5D1 9385 88CB 7E5F BE64 6618 BCA6 6E33 F672 2D76
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> vdsm-devel mailing list
vdsm-devel mailing list