于 2012-4-27 5:13, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden 写道:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:11:49AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:12:06PM +0800, Shu Ming wrote:
One more comment about the test package version.  Most likely, the
package version will be the same version as the VDSM package
version.  The rule we need to consider is: Should we keep the back
compatibility with the VDSM files? Say allow newer version test
package running on older VDSM files? Or just allow run the same
version of test package and VDSM package.One more comment about the
test package version.  Most likely, the package version will be the
same version as the VDSM package version.  The rule we need to
consider is: Should we keep the back compatibility with the VDSM
files? Say allow newer version test package running on older VDSM
files? Or just allow run the same version of test package and VDSM
package.


Backwards-compatible tests is not a good idea in my opinion.  I would say that
the test rpm should require the exact same vdsm version.
+1
I guess it is the advantage to place test project inside vdsm project,
they have major version synchronized always. User could get an older
version with git reset.

_______________________________________________
vdsm-devel mailing list
vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel


_______________________________________________
vdsm-devel mailing list
vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel

Reply via email to