* Mark Wu <wu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [2012-05-09 04:58]:
> Hi Guys,
> I think people always test their patch before submitting, so
> explicitly setting "verified" is not necessary. More importantly,
> "verified" by the committer is not convincible //enough for code
> quality assurance. What's your opinion?
I believe the Verified check is to have someone with a different
environment apply the patch and test. This gives us some additional
test to ensure that the patch isn't going to break something before
I'm fine with the setting; even without gerrit there are maintainers who
won't take patches that don't have a 'Tested-by:' tag.
> vdsm-devel mailing list
Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center
IBM Corp., Austin, Tx
vdsm-devel mailing list