On 05/18/2012 04:28 PM, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
On 05/17/2012 11:05 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 05/17/2012 06:55 PM, Bharata B Rao wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Itamar Heim<ih...@redhat.com> wrote:
On 05/15/2012 07:35 PM, Andrei Vakhnin wrote:
Thanks for an update. Can I have KVM hypervisors also function as
nodes for glusterfs? What is a release date for glusterfs support?
looking for a production deployment in June. Thanks
current status is
1. patches for provisioning gluster clusters and volumes via ovirt
review, trying to cover this feature set .
I'm not sure if all of them will make the ovirt 3.1 version which is
to branch for stabilization June 1st, but i think "enough" is there.
so i'd start trying current upstream version to help find issues
you, and following on them during june as we stabilize ovirt 3.1 for
(planned for end of june).
2. you should be able to use same hosts for both gluster and virt,
is no special logic/handling for this yet (i.e., trying and providing
feedback would help improve this mode).
I would suggest start from separate clusters though first, and only
trying the joint mode.
3. creating a storage domain on top of gluster:
- expose NFS on top of it, and consume as a normal nfs storage domain
- use posixfs storage domain with gluster mount semantics
- future: probably native gluster storage domain, up to native
integration with qemu
I am looking at GlusterFS integration with QEMU which involves adding
GlusterFS as block backend in QEMU. This will involve QEMU talking to
gluster directly via libglusterfs bypassing FUSE. I could specify a
volume file and the VM image directly on QEMU command line to boot
from the VM image that resides on a gluster volume.
Eg: qemu -drive file=client.vol:/Fedora.img,format=gluster
In this example, Fedora.img is being served by gluster and client.vol
would have client-side translators specified.
I am not sure if this use case would be served if GlusterFS is
integrated as posixfs storage domain in VDSM. Posixfs would involve
normal FUSE mount and QEMU would be required to work with images from
FUSE mount path ?
With QEMU supporting GlusterFS backend natively, further optimizations
are possible in case of gluster volume being local to the host node.
In this case, one could provide QEMU with a simple volume file that
would not contain client or server xlators, but instead just the posix
xlator. This would lead to most optimal IO path that bypasses RPC
So do you think, this use case (QEMU supporting GlusterFS backend
natively and using volume file to specify the needed translators)
warrants a specialized storage domain type for GlusterFS in VDSM ?
I'm not sure if a special storage domain, or a PosixFS based domain
with enhanced capabilities.
With QEMU using GlusterFS backend natively (as described above), it also
it needs addnl options/parameters as part of qemu command line (as given
There is no support in qemu for gluster yet but it will be there not far
How does VDSM today support generating a custom qemu cmdline. I know
VDSM talks to libvirt,
so is there a framework in VDSM to edit/modify the domxml based on some
and how / where one should hook up to do that modification ? I know of
framework in VDSM, but that was more for temporary/experimental needs,
or am i completely
wrong here ?
Irrespective of whether GlusterFS integrates into VDSM as PosixFS or
special storage domain
it won't address the need to generate a custom qemu cmdline if a
file/image was served by
GlusterFS. Whats the way to address this issue in VDSM ?
I am assuming here that special storage domain (aka repo engine) is only
to manage image
repository, and image related operations, won't help in modifying qemu
cmd line being generated.
[Ccing vdsm-devel also]
vdsm-devel mailing list
vdsm-devel mailing list