On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 05:31:11PM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 10:55:44PM +0300, Ayal Baron wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I would like to discuss the following on our upcoming call:
> > 
> > - reviewers are missing!
> > - reviewers/verifiers are missing for pep8 patches. I would like to
> >   ask a volunteer to aggregate them all in one branch, and get some
> >   folks from Red Hat QE to run some sanity test on them.
> Adam would find a volunteer to do that.
> Regarding the new image model - Adam, could you see if your model fits
> Saggi's futuristic take (and vice versa)? Eduardo told me that he does
> not see the "Image" as an object that should be modeled at all. I hope
> he has constructive suggestions to Adam's API.

Hmm, interesting... In Beijing I was told that images (not Volumes) were the
object to be modelled.  It would be nice to have some coordination and clarity
on this.

Adam Litke <a...@us.ibm.com>
IBM Linux Technology Center

vdsm-devel mailing list

Reply via email to