On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 05:31:11PM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 10:55:44PM +0300, Ayal Baron wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I would like to discuss the following on our upcoming call:
> > - reviewers are missing!
> > - reviewers/verifiers are missing for pep8 patches. I would like to
> > ask a volunteer to aggregate them all in one branch, and get some
> > folks from Red Hat QE to run some sanity test on them.
> Adam would find a volunteer to do that.
> Regarding the new image model - Adam, could you see if your model fits
> Saggi's futuristic take (and vice versa)? Eduardo told me that he does
> not see the "Image" as an object that should be modeled at all. I hope
> he has constructive suggestions to Adam's API.
Hmm, interesting... In Beijing I was told that images (not Volumes) were the
object to be modelled. It would be nice to have some coordination and clarity
Adam Litke <a...@us.ibm.com>
IBM Linux Technology Center
vdsm-devel mailing list