Do I get it right that host-side of MOM communicates with guest side
over network interface? If so, why isn't it following best practices of
qemu/kvm world and why it doesn't communicate over its own virtio-serial
port?

David


Mark Wu píše v St 30. 05. 2012 v 22:49 +0800:
> Hi Guys,
> 
> Recently,  I has been working on integrate MOM into VDSM.  MOM needs to 
> use VDSM API to interact with it.  But currently, it requires the 
> instance of clientIF to use vdsm API.  Passing clientIF to MOM is not a 
> good choice since it's a vdsm internal object.  So I try to remove the 
> parameter 'cif' from the interface definition and change to access the 
> globally unique  clientIF instance in API.py.
> 
> To get the instance of clientIF,  I add a decorator to clientIF to 
> change it into singleton. Actually, clientIF has been working as a 
> global single instance already.  We just don't have an interface to get 
> it and so passing it as parameter instead.  I think using singleton to 
> get the instance of clientIF is more clean.
> 
> Dan and Saggi already gave some comments in 
> http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#change,4839  Thanks for the reviewing!  But I 
> think we need more discussion on it,  so I post it here because gerrit 
> is not the appropriate to discuss a design issue.
> 
> Thanks !
> Mark.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> vdsm-devel mailing list
> vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel

-- 

David Jaša, RHCE

SPICE QE based in Brno
GPG Key:     22C33E24 
Fingerprint: 513A 060B D1B4 2A72 7F0D 0278 B125 CD00 22C3 3E24



_______________________________________________
vdsm-devel mailing list
vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel

Reply via email to