On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 04:53:04AM -0400, Ayal Baron wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Sorry for cross-posting, but in this case I think it's relevant.
> 
> The original idea was that every time we wish to discuss a new 
> cross-component feature we should do it over arch list. However, it would 
> appear that de-facto usually engine-devel and vdsm-devel are being used 
> (cross posted).
> Currently engine-devel has 211 subscribers, arch has 160 and vdsm-devel has 
> 128 so from this perspective again, arch seems less relevant.
> I propose we ditch arch and keep the other 2 mailing lists.
> I'm not sure whether new cross-component features should be discussed solely 
> on engine-devel or cross-posted (there are probably people who wouldn't care 
> about engine side but would still like to know about such changes).

+1 to ditching arch.  I would still prefer that cross-component features
cross-post to vdsm-devel and engine-devel.  My current focus is on vdsm and the
traffic level on that list is currently far more manageable than that of
engine-devel. 

-- 
Adam Litke <a...@us.ibm.com>
IBM Linux Technology Center

_______________________________________________
vdsm-devel mailing list
vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel

Reply via email to