----- Original Message -----
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 04:53:04AM -0400, Ayal Baron wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > Sorry for cross-posting, but in this case I think it's relevant.
> > The original idea was that every time we wish to discuss a new
> > cross-component feature we should do it over arch list. However,
> > it would appear that de-facto usually engine-devel and vdsm-devel
> > are being used (cross posted).
> > Currently engine-devel has 211 subscribers, arch has 160 and
> > vdsm-devel has 128 so from this perspective again, arch seems less
> > relevant.
> > I propose we ditch arch and keep the other 2 mailing lists.
> > I'm not sure whether new cross-component features should be
> > discussed solely on engine-devel or cross-posted (there are
> > probably people who wouldn't care about engine side but would
> > still like to know about such changes).
> +1 to ditching arch. I would still prefer that cross-component
> cross-post to vdsm-devel and engine-devel. My current focus is on
> vdsm and the
> traffic level on that list is currently far more manageable than that
That's my sentiment as well (plus I have a rule to drop duplicates so I don't
care much about it ;)
> Adam Litke <a...@us.ibm.com>
> IBM Linux Technology Center
vdsm-devel mailing list