* Eyal Edri <ee...@redhat.com> [2012-07-18 11:59]:
> I'm in favor on doing it next monday.
> (not too healthy to do upgrades before the weekend...).
> 
> We'll need to send email to rhev-devel + qe for an estimated downtime of 1 
> hour for gerrit.eng.lab.tlv.redhat.com.
> 

Any update?

> Eyal.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Itamar Heim" <ih...@redhat.com>
> > To: "Ryan Harper" <ry...@us.ibm.com>
> > Cc: "Dan Kenigsberg" <dan...@redhat.com>, "Adam Litke" <a...@us.ibm.com>, 
> > "Anthony Liguori" <aligu...@us.ibm.com>,
> > "VDSM Project Development" <vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org>, "Eyal Edri" 
> > <ee...@redhat.com>, "Attila Darazs"
> > <adar...@redhat.com>, "Moran Goldboim" <mgold...@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 7:48:01 PM
> > Subject: Re: [vdsm] minutes: today's call
> > 
> > On 07/18/2012 06:24 PM, Ryan Harper wrote:
> > > * Itamar Heim <ih...@redhat.com> [2012-05-16 10:26]:
> > >> On 05/16/2012 06:11 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> > >>> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 09:43:57AM -0500, Ryan Harper wrote:
> > >>>> * Dan Kenigsberg<dan...@redhat.com>  [2012-05-07 05:42]:
> > >>>>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 05:52:13PM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> > >>>>>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 07:34:14AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
> > >>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 04:17:18AM -0400, Ayal Baron wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> Hi all,
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> I would like to discuss the following on today's call:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> 1. Gerrit vs. mailing list
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Gerrit is an inhibiter for some contributors.
> > >>>>>> One approach to solve this improve gerrit:
> > >>>>>> - Gerrit should send the patch when it notified of a change.
> > >>>>>> This may
> > >>>>>>    attract more reviewers.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I'm happy to inform that Gal has sent a patch for this to
> > >>>>> upstream
> > >>>>> gerrit:
> > >>>>> https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/c/34861/
> > >>>>> Add unified diff to newchange mail template.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Any eta on getting the gerrit notifications of changes to
> > >>>> include the
> > >>>> full patch in the email?
> > >>>
> > >>> You can +1 them in googlesource, maybe it helps ;-)
> > >>
> > >> indeed, please help push them upstream...
> > >> https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/c/34861/
> > >> https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/c/34862/
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I'm definitely happy to see notification on new posts and
> > >>>> changes; helps
> > >>>> me see what new activity is happening, but I'd really enjoy
> > >>>> seeing the
> > >>>> the patch series attached (via threading) as well.
> > >>>
> > >>> Itamar, I know Red Hat hates to do it, but can we take these
> > >>> patches to
> > >>> ovirt's gerrit before they are accepted upstream?
> > >>
> > >> yes we can.
> > >> after i'll upgrade it to 2.3, which i prefer to do after i return
> > >> from PTO in case there are some issues with the upgrade.
> > >> so ETA end of the month for clean upgrade to 2.3, then after we
> > >> see
> > >> all is ok, let's say another week to upgrade to the version with
> > >> these patches.
> > >
> > > It's about 6 weeks later.  Dan's been asking for more review in
> > > vdsm;
> > > I know that I'd be able to review quite a bit more if I can get
> > > patches
> > > via email instead of the webui.
> > >
> > > Can we get this enabled?
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > eyal/attila - any ETA on testing gerrit 2.4 (.2 by now) so we can
> > upgrade to it?
> > 
> > 

-- 
Ryan Harper
Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center
IBM Corp., Austin, Tx
ry...@us.ibm.com

_______________________________________________
vdsm-devel mailing list
vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel

Reply via email to