On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 03:31:23PM +0800, Sheldon wrote:
> Hi, ALL.
> I have submitted a patchhttp://gerrit.ovirt.org/4174
> it is about "make compression type configurable, support gzip and xz"
> As I mentioned in message that vdsm require "xz" for logrotate.
> So I think there is no need to support two kinds of compression format: xz
> and gzip.
> I have get some comments on this patch.
> It seems xz is better.
> XZ utils supports multi threading, and the compression ratio is better than
> And it is supports many platforms (seehttp://tukaani.org/xz/ , look for
> Supported platforms).
> Since xz gets higher compression efficiency and the logrotate has already
> required "xz"
> So how about to abandon gzip, only use xz?
I don't really understand your motivation.
Practically every open source project on the face of this planet, ships
its source as a gzip'ed tarball. Which projects use xz for that?
vdsm-devel mailing list