On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 03:31:23PM +0800, Sheldon wrote: > Hi, ALL. > > I have submitted a patchhttp://gerrit.ovirt.org/4174 > it is about "make compression type configurable, support gzip and xz" > > As I mentioned in message that vdsm require "xz" for logrotate. > So I think there is no need to support two kinds of compression format: xz > and gzip. > > > I have get some comments on this patch. > > It seems xz is better. > XZ utils supports multi threading, and the compression ratio is better than > gzip. > And it is supports many platforms (seehttp://tukaani.org/xz/ , look for > Supported platforms). > > > Since xz gets higher compression efficiency and the logrotate has already > required "xz" > So how about to abandon gzip, only use xz?
I don't really understand your motivation. Practically every open source project on the face of this planet, ships its source as a gzip'ed tarball. Which projects use xz for that? Dan. _______________________________________________ vdsm-devel mailing list email@example.com https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel