On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:54:58PM +0100, Vinzenz Feenstra wrote:
> On 11/13/2012 12:16 PM, Zhou Zheng Sheng wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >In the latest version of pep8 checking tool, the rules are very strict.
> >Currently the VDSM project applies a less strict rule set by suppressing
> >some errors from pep8. You can find them at Makefile.am . Under the
> >"check-local:" target, you will see
> >
> >--ignore=E121,E122,E123,E124,E125,E126,E127,E128,E241
> >
> >
> >I know some of us using editor plugins to check pep8 erros. Those
> >plugins invoke flake8/pep8 and report errors. To ignore some rules not
> >needed by VDSM in the editor, create a file in ~/.config/pep8 and input
> >the text as follow.
> >
> >[pep8]
> >ignore=E121,E122,E123,E124,E125,E126,E127,E128,E241
> >
> Hi,
> I am actually for being more strict than more relaxed. I don't see a
> point in saying we're following the PEP8 guidelines and then
> disabling them again. Where's the point in that?
> It's maybe a pain to get us to a pep8 ready state, but I would
> prefer to see no exceptions (ignores).

Indeed. The only point for my adding this exceptions was that vdsm would
otherwise not build on Fedora 18. I would like to see our code fully
confrming to the standards. Even though some of them are really
vdsm-devel mailing list

Reply via email to