On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 05:25:10PM +0200, ybronhei wrote:
> On 12/05/2012 04:32 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
> >On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 11:05:21AM +0200, ybronhei wrote:
> >>Today in the Api we display general information about the host that
> >>vdsm export by getCapabilities Api.
> >>We decided to add bios information as part of the information that
> >>is displayed in UI under host's general sub-tab.
> >>To summaries the feature - We'll modify General tab to Software
> >>Information and add another tab for Hardware Information which will
> >>include all the bios data that we'll decide to gather from the host
> >>and display.
> >>Following this feature page:
> >>http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Design/HostBiosInfo for more details.
> >>All the parameters that can be displayed are mentioned in the wiki.
> >>I would greatly appreciate your comments and questions.
> >Seems good to me but I would like to throw out one suggestion.
> >getVdsCapabilities is already a huge command that does a lot of time
> >things. As part of the vdsm API refactoring, we are going to start favoring
> >small and concise APIs over "bag" APIs. Perhaps we should just add a new
> >Host.getVdsBiosInfo() that returns only this information.
> It leads to modification also in how the engine collects the
> parameters with the new api request and I'm not sure if we should
> get into this.. Now we have specific known way of how engine
> requests for capabilities, when and how it effects the status of the
> host that is shown via the UI.
> To simplify this feature I prefer to use the current way of
> gathering and providing host's information. If we'll decide to split
> the host's capabilities api, it needs to get rfcs mail of its own
> because it changes engine's internal flows and it makes this feature
> to something much more influential.
I don't understand. Why can't you just call both APIs, one after the other?
Adam Litke <a...@us.ibm.com>
IBM Linux Technology Center
vdsm-devel mailing list