On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 04:21:16PM -0600, Dead Horse wrote:
> Any movement or thoughts yet on this one: http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/11492/
> It still has vdsm master broken.
Guys, I think that DHC is right - we cannot keep deliberating forever.
Having a process leak is bad, but keeping master broken for so long is
So unless anyone violently objects, I'll revert the offending patch.
vdsm-devel mailing list